Go to content

Seventhday Adventist - Removing The Fog of Religion

Skip menu

Seventhday Adventist

His Name Studies > Christian Leadership Response
 
Amazing Facts Answer to - Why not YaHshua?
 
I have added my comments about the statements made in this email that I received from the Amazing Facts Ministries after I asked about their position concerning God's Name, and that of His Son -- their admissions and denials.
  
From Amazing Facts Ministries
Hello Dan,
The Hebrews felt that the name of God was too holy to even pronounce. We know that the personal name of the God worshiped by the Israelites and their progenitors is represented by four Hebrew letters transliterated Yhwh. This term appears some 6,800 times in the Hebrew O.T. Instead of transliterating this name, most of the translations substitute the word for lord, or Lord, and the divine name as LORD.
 
My response:  The Hebrews never practiced this kind of name substitution .  However, in later centuries, after our Savior was crucified, that is when this became a thing among some, not all, Jewish scholars.  There is evidence that those responsible for the translating of the Hebrew Writings, even as the language changed, retained the Hebrew, four letter, writing of His Holy Name.  It was left up to the reader to be able to see and say His Holy Name.  [ read and see also -- His Name From Ancient Time

Some esteemed guides of the people, began to hid His Holy Name, as a righteous thing to do.  Anyone who would dare pronounce His Holy Name out loud were looked down on -- even accused of breaking the third commandment.  This, however, was a later development, and not an original Biblical position.  Read it for yourself, His Name is emphasized over and over again throughout the whole of the Old Testament, disguised by the letters, LORD.  Men have replaced His Holy Name it with a lesser term, like previously mentioned -- LORD.  I wonder if the author of this return email can hear themselves.  This literary crime, is openly admitted in the last line of the above response --  
 
New Testament writers followed the practice of the Septuagint translators. Nowhere do they use the divine name Yhwh except as it occurs in compound names or terms transliterating the Hebrew. There are certain religious groups active today conducting a campaign to have the divine name brought back into usage, but they have no divine warrant for their contention. Nowhere, not even once, in the New Testament writers' numerous references to the Deity, did they use the divine name Yhwh, unless they were quoting. So if the N.T. writers felt no urge by the Holy Spirit to revive the use of the divine name, we should feel no compulsion and let it rest at that.

My Response: It seems that all modern preacher, teacher, and minsters resort to this excuse, calling on the Septuagint, a Greek translation for the Hebrew text.  So, if the Greeks changed the name, then that makes it all right?  What kind of reasoning is that?  And what is wrong with some groups campaigning to restore His divine Name?  Isn't that better than using names other than His.  How about we call Doug Bachelor, Sam Ham?  Why not, Sam Ham is the man, why not?  Because no one would know who you are talking about or who you are addressing and if you called out to him, Hey, Sam Ham, he would not respond, but this is how we are told to handle the Holy Identity of our Creator?  Oh, and then to blame the Holy Spirit for inspiring His Name to be changed?  This could be approaching Blaspheme.  
 
The most important thing, I believe is not to worry so much about the name, as to know the Deity Himself, His character, His purposes, His will. The term "name" as used in Hebrew often means nature, reputation, character, and it is a knowledge of the divine name in this sense that Christians should seek. My thought is that we are spending a lot of time on side issues -- debating whether we have the right articulation of Hebrew and Greek words -- when there are souls out there dying because they have never heard the name of Jesus. I believe that God is much more concerned about heart surrender, for He says that people honor Him with their lips, but their hearts are "far from me." -Isa. 29:13.   (emphasis mine)

My Response: Not to worry so much about His Name, His Holy Identity?  Read Acts 4:12, and say that, and then read, Mat 11:27 and Ph 2:9-11, also.  Whose Name do you confess?  Oh, any name will do, you say?  And, what, people are dying in the name of Jesus?  Names don't matter?  That is proof?  Oh, and then you say it is about "articulation"?  How do you articulate the name Jesus?  Geezus, or. as over a third of the world articulates His Name as Hey Zeus, Hezeus (The Zeus).  I, and a few others, think it does matter.  Certainly the name used to replace our Savior's Name is not His Name, simple as that, even as this letter admits to.  The Name He was given by His Heavenly Father does not matter to them -- in fact, to the majority of Christian Churches.  The translators (scribes) are wrong and are afraid to admit it -- imagine if they did, all of the bibles they would have to recall, and all of the books they would have to change, but only after wiping all of the egg of error from their faces, the admissions of incomplete baptisms, imagine.
Continue --

Jesus summed up the importance of a knowledge of the Deity: "And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent." (John 17:3; See also Hosea 6:6, Jer. 9:24 and Hab. 2:14)

My Response:  Now read the quotes you gave, only this time, with the Names restored.  Your name is Sharon, why don't i just call you Chuck, Sally or Sue?  If your name is important to you, how much more His Name -- even in you examples verses, His Name, though presented incorrectly, is central.  You know, it isn't like we do not have His Name today.  We have His Name, it is in the Old Testament as Joshua, the Old English transliteration, certainly, but it begs the question, Why not use that Name, why use a name so different, a name pronounced so very different?  Why use a made up name?  Why not use the Name we see and read in the Old Testament in the New Testament?  Why drop Joshua as presented in the English Old Testament for Jesus, a completely different name?  Joshua, pronounced as YaHshua, has been around for some 3,000 years and is the name of the individual that led the Chosen people of YaHWeH into the Promised land -- surely you know this?  It is fitting, then, that our Savior, who is going to lead us into the Kingdom of God the Father would have the same name, Joshua, or YaHshua, and not the bogus name JESUS, a name that is not even close to the Name He was named at Birth.   Make no mistake the translations you read today were not written in the first Century, so they had plenty of time to replace His true Name with a false name.  I say THEY, meaning the Devil and his angels -- even those they influence.  
 
Thank you for contacting Amazing Facts and hope this helps you in your study of God's name.  Please write again if you have more questions. God bless!
Sharon,  Amazing Facts Team    http://www.amazingfacts.org
 Comments or Questions to:  dan@servantsofyahshua.com
 
Back to content